Page 1
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
Sustainable economic growth
depends
on a comprehensive transportation system that maintains
the roads Minnesota has built and improves the system
capacity with timely investment. Farmers, manufacturers,
commuters, and other travelers all need reliable
transportation, or productivity suffers and we all pay more.
Congestion, safety concerns and the lack of alternatives
combine to make Minnesotans constantly worried about
being late and frustrated at the waste of their time.
Minnesota's transportation system is increasingly
unreliable. Today the state postpones or cancels projects,
relies on borrow-now-pay-later gimmicks to build individual
projects, and shoves the debt onto future generations.
Imagine getting to your child's
soccer game, arriving home for a
relaxed family dinner, or having a
package delivered - all on time.
Imagine roads free from potholes and no more repair bills
for bent wheel rims. Imagine free flowing traffic without
crash-related backups caused by irresponsible drivers.
Imagine all-season roads (carrying heavy trucks and your
products) without delays due to rerouting. Imagine a safe
and reliable road system in both metro and rural Minnesota.
Imagine a transit system that actually competes with the car
for convenience and reliability. Imagine moving quickly and
safely through once notorious metro bottlenecks. Imagine
not being frustrated all the time.
[CROSSTOWN
HIGHWAY:
Posterchild of Minnesota's
Transportation Mess]
The list of projects
cancelled
or postponed is
spread all over the
state - Highway 12 through
Orono and Long Lake,
reconstruction of Highway 7 near
Silver Lake and Highway 19 in
the
Marshall area, the I-494/Hwy 169
interchange - and the list goes
on and on. But nothing illustrates
the mess like the Crosstown - an
antiquated piece of road
engineering requiring drivers to
execute a compound merge on
Highway 62 or I-35, just to
continue in the direction they
were already going, screwing up
schedules, exhausting patience
and needlessly burning millions
of gallons of fuel. Rather than
properly financing the project
with state resources, the
Pawlenty/Molnau Administration
went begging to the construction
community to bankroll the
project. Not surprisingly, the
industry refused. There were no
bidders. Result: Another wasted
construction season. If the
project starts next spring, it will
cost 15 percent more than it
would have if MnDOT had been
able to get it started this year.

Page 2
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
[THE FACTS]
Road Condition
* The quality of Minnesota's roads is the worst it has been in 20 years.
* During the Pawlenty/Molnau Administration, the percentage of roads in good
condition fell below the state's performance targets for the first time in decades.
Conversely, the percentage of roads in bad condition is now above what MnDOT
considers acceptable.
* MnDOT says there are now more potholes and cracked pavements per mile throughout the state than at
any time in two decades.
Source: Adapted from MnDOT 2005 Pavement Condition Summary
* Now that Minnesota's transportation system is a deteriorating asset, MnDOT estimates that return-
ing to normal road performance standards could take until at least 2014.
* Critical funds needed to properly maintain current roads are now being raided to pay off the debt
incurred to pay for new road projects.
* The list of delayed road projects is still growing. Between now and 2014, that gap between MnDOT
projections of what it will cost to achieve their performance standards and forecasted available
revenue is a whopping $2.4 billion a year.

Page 3
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
Fiscal Management
* The gas tax is a source of revenue that is losing ground as the mainstay of transportation funding. In fact,
local property taxes, not the state's gas tax, are now the largest source of transportation funding.
* Even though today there are more vehicles driving more miles, and Minnesotans are buying more gas, the
value of the 20-cent tax on a gallon of gas, established in 1988, is worth only 12 cents today. Local property
taxes have been used to fill the gap - and they are rising.
* Instead of maintaining the roads we have, the Pawlenty/Molnau Administration borrowed heavily to build more
new roads. Their blind allegiance to a no-new-taxes pledge has meant Minnesota does not have the revenue
needed to pay-as-we-go to get the job done.
* The Pawlenty/Molnau Administration bet on advanced funding (borrowing) from the federal government - and
lost. The state overestimated what the feds would dole out. Worse yet, the Pawlenty/Molnau Administration's
fiscal mismanagement has resulted in federal money being left on the table.
* The Pawlenty/Molnau Administration underestimated inflation in construction costs. Transportation is a mate-
rials and capital sensitive sector of the world's economy. With China and India consuming more and more
resources, Minnesota is experiencing annual transportation cost inflation of 15 percent. After borrowing nearly
$1 billion, MnDOT announced that the projects to be funded by that debt were $300 million over budget.
* Because of its fiscal problems, the state has demanded local governments shoulder a greater share of the
burden for regional road projects than ever before. Not surprisingly, this has forced local governments to impose
higher property taxes on their own residents or siphon money away from necessary maintenance of existing
roads - or both.
* The Pawlenty/Molnau Administration gambled again when they pressured the construction industry to bankroll
the Crosstown/35W project. They lost again when contractors refused to bid on the job.
* MnDOT had a cash balance of $155 million when the Pawlenty/Molnau Administration took office. The
Pawlenty/Molnau Administration ran that fund down to a $60 million deficit, reversing a tradition of having money
on hand when contracts are signed.
* Compared to places like Denver, Phoenix, and Dallas, the Twin Cities region's multi-modal transportation
system is falling behind.
* Ways of getting around besides cars - buses, LRT, rail - have no reliable source of funding.
* The Legislature's habit of considering transportation funding decisions in a piecemeal fashion contributes to
Minnesota's lack of an integrated transportation system.

Page 4
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
Congestion
* There is no easy cure for congestion (metro populations are growing), but it can be better managed
with a strategic transportation plan and the financing to go with it.
* Minnesotans' frustration is growing. The reasons are clear:
More people driving and people driving more
Poor and ineffective road management (e.g. signal timing)
Crashes caused by poor and/or distracted drivers
Distracted Drivers
* To nobody's surprise, U of M researchers have
found that drivers talking on the cell phone are more
dangerous than drivers not doing anything else
while driving.
* However, contrary to conventional wisdom,
researchers found sober drivers doing something
else (e.g., talking on the phone, eating food, fiddling
with the radio or CD player, etc.) while driving are
actually more impaired than drunk drivers not doing
anything else while driving.
* The Minnesota Department of Public Safety
reported that in 2005 crashes, many of which are
the result of distracted driving, resulted in more than
550 deaths and cost Minnesota $1.7 billion.
Opposing Views
* Some believe that progress can only be made by increasing the gas tax. Others oppose any tax
increase.
* Some will get on board only if transit is part of the package. Others adamantly oppose any
expansion of transit.
* Greater Minnesota is often suspicious of the metro area. Metro representatives claim they need a
bigger share of the funds.
* Contending views of this sort have produced one of the longest stalemates in state history. It has
been 18 years since the last substantial change in transportation policy or funding.
* The price of inaction has been huge. Congestion, delay, wasted gas, potholes and increased
vehicle repairs are all part of the true cost of getting nothing done. Minnesotans have waited long
enough.
Adapted from the Federal Highway Administration
Causes of Congestion

Page 5
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
What Minnesota Wants
* Minnesotans repeatedly
call transportation a major frustration
and cite it as one of
the key issues government should address.
* Minnesotans are a demanding bunch; they are not willing to simply pay more. They
will
only pay more to get more results.
* Minnesotans
expect a transportation system that is balanced
so that no
part (roads vs. transit, metro vs. greater Minnesota) is favored at the expense of another.
They expect a system that demands better results from government and more personal
responsibility from users. Such a system must deliver greater reliability and safety (and,
ultimately, less frustration).
* Minnesotans
expect a solution
to their transportation headaches that:
* Eliminates bottlenecks
* Makes sound investment, maintenance and management decisions to improve the
use of roads as corridors for either shipping goods, commuting, recreation/ tourism or
local access
* Creates a system with viable transit alternatives
* Reduces the number of crashes by poor and distracted drivers
[what needs to be done]
1
Put a qualified leader - not a politician -
in charge of MnDOT.
Governor Pawlenty's experiment of appointing the
Lt. Governor to lead a state department has failed. People across Minnesota now have road and transit
conditions that are the worst they've experienced in decades. Minnesota needs a new Commissioner of
Transportation. When elected, Governor Hutchinson will appoint a new Commissioner, one he is
willing to hold accountable for results.

Page 6
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
[The MVST Constitutional
Amendment: Why We Think It Is
Unnecessary]
Minnesotans are being asked to vote
this November on a
constitutional amendment
dedicating all the motor vehicle sales
tax (MVST) revenues to
transportation - to be split between
roads and transit. While we support
the intent, we believe this proposed
constitutional amendment is
unnecessary. Minnesotans are
willing to pay the price for better
roads and a better transportation
system. The Governor and the
Legislature should do the jobs they
were elected to do - dedicate the
money from MVST by law and make
it stick. It is cowardly for our elected
leaders to push the job off on voters
and say, "You do this." It's never
good policy to cram these
financial decisions into the state
Constitution, sealing up flexibility for
all time.
The Hutchinson Administration
will make the dedication of all
motor vehicle sales tax revenue to
transportation a fundamental part
of its transportation budget, and
will ask that the bill be among the
first on the Governor's desk when
the 2007 Legislature gets to work.
Governor Hutchinson will
sign a comprehensive
transportation bill, not veto it.
Pass (again!) the 2005
bi-partisan transportation bill
that the Governor vetoed.
2
When enacted, this legislation will:
* Raise the gas tax, in two steps, by a total of 10 cents per
gallon
* Allocate one-fourth of 1 percent of the 6.5 percent sales tax
to metro and Greater Minnesota transit
* Dedicate all motor vehicle sales tax revenue for
transportation
* Improve rural roads for safety and weight strength (more
10-ton roads)
* Accelerate fixing suburban bottlenecks
The legislation will commit an additional $7 billion over 10
years to begin fixing Minnesota's transportation mess.
Today, state and local government in Minnesota raise a total
of $16.20 for every $100 of personal income generated in
the state. That's the "price of government" and it is slightly
below the historical, 30-year average of $16.50. Fully
enacting this legislation will raise the price of government by
14 cents to $16.34.

Page 7
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
3
Make transportation investment decisions based on
their expected contribution to improving key
elements of the system, not on politics.
We will follow these steps:
* Create reliability, safety and performance specifications for each type of transportation
corridor -- goods shipment, commuter, recreation/ tourism, local access
* Assess current performance against those specifications and identify key gaps in performance
* Prioritize and pay for investments in new infrastructure as well as maintenance and
management of existing infrastructure based on their enhancement of reliability and safety
4
Get serious about building a system of
transit in the metro area.
* Finish both the NorthStar and Central corridors
* Expand and integrate local and express buses with rail service
* Set a clear timetable for implementing the remaining pieces of
the system
Hold users responsible for their impact on the
reliability and safety of roads we share.
* Expand the use of tolls and carpool/ transit incentives to manage traffic on congested freeways
* Enact crash penalties and other incentives to reduce distracted driving
* Evaluate new technologies that facilitate charging motorists by how much they drive rather than
only by how much gas they consume. This would be a major transformation of how
transportation is funded and will require thoughtful research and citizen engagement.
5

Page 8
Transportation
Minnesota's Great Frustration
How We'll Work Together
[Minnesotans pay almost $1 million every year for our statewide elected officers.
Citizens expect all five of these office holders to work together to produce results like
better transportation. Here's how each member of Team Minnesota will contribute
to making transportation reform happen.]
The Governor (Peter Hutchinson)
& Lt. Governor (Dr. Maureen Reed) will:
* Appoint a professional, experienced, and effective leader as Commissioner of
Transportation and hold that individual accountable for delivering these results
* Propose a budget that lays out the investments that need to be made in our
transportation system and how to pay for them without massive borrowing or
accounting gimmicks
The Attorney General (John James) will:
* Review proposed legislation to ensure that it does not violate the state
Constitution- before the bill is signed
* Ensure that the state Constitution is protected from being used as a substitute for the
Governor and Legislature doing the work they are elected to do
* Review state transportation contracting and administrative rulemaking procedures and
practices to ensure they will reduce bureaucratic frustration while complying with
state law
The State Auditor (Lucy Gerold) will:
* Engage with local governments (townships, cities, counties and regional transportation
agencies) and their elected officials to make them an active partner in the design and
implementation of these reforms
* Facilitate the sharing of "best practices" among local governments around
transportation - related issues and programs
* Ensure that local governments are effectively using state funds to achieve these
transportation results
The Secretary of State (Joel Spoonheim) will:
* Engage non-government organizations and groups - such as local
chambers of commerce, transportation advocacy groups, industry-specific
associations, etc. - to bring their voices, insights, and creativity into the debate
* Create opportunities for all citizens and offer their reactions and ideas
* Work with the Legislature to move this budget and other key pieces of legislation forward
* Travel around the state talking to Minnesotans about the merits of this plan and how they can support it
Prepared and paid for by the Independence Party - Team Minnesota PO Box 40459 St. Paul MN 55104 * www.TeamMN.com